Hello Curtis,
Thursday, September 1, 2005, 4:59:21 AM, you wrote:

C> Though it's a tad less useful than when I used to use the ticker. I
C> landed on this your message and the colouring didn't show since the
C> message is selected. I could have jumped to the next unread somewhere
C> further down the list and as a result, miss the colour coding.

Yes it all depends on how you do things. I always read my messages
from tbbeta by viewing "Unread Messages Only" so I don't have any big
jumps from message to message and can usually see when a green color
group is in the queue. It is also useful for Virtual Folders as you
can just set them to a specific color group instead of having to
define the sorting filter. This way you could browse your personal
messages before scanning the rest of the list.

C> One suggestion comes immediately to mind, especially since, for the next
C> couple days, I will not have time to run the test. Why not include an
C> exclusion string matching criteria for the reply messages in the basic
C> colour filter. In that way, the replies to your messages are not caught
C> by the first filter that colours tbudl messages blue.

C> For first filter:

C> reply-to header contains 'tbudl@'

C> and header does not match 'in-reply-to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]'

I will give this a try, although it is partially my intention to point
out to Ritlabs that the way it works in POP isn't working in IMAP. I
know in some cases POP and IMAP differ and cannot work alike, but I
think in this case they should be able to.

-- 
Best regards,
 Stuart                            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


________________________________________________________
 Current beta is 3.60.07 forerunner | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Reply via email to