Hello MAU, Wednesday, October 5, 2005, 4:38:19 AM, you wrote: > Have you ever tried POPFile? I've been running it for over 2 years with > an accuracy of 99.81%.
I have not tried any alternative spam filters partially because of what it says in my sig below. (Windows 98 4.10 Build 2222 A) This machine is only a 166MHz machine and is already quite slow. Adding additional programs will only slow things down even more. I do thank you for your suggestion and also Alexander (I think) for the K9 suggestion, however as I mentioned in another thread I think a self contained solution would be best. The first review I ever read about TB! mentioned its lack of a spam filter as a drawback, although I don't know if any others have good spam filters either. :) Maybe I will give POPfile and/or K9 on a different computer and see how it goes. -- Stuart mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.61.09 Echo (Beta) on Windows 98 4.10 Build 2222 A ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.61.09 (Echo) | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
