Hi Simon, Wednesday, April 26, 2006 you answered my report:
CF>> I tried it with a randomly chosen word and I have CF>> selected all folders. "Stop" doesn't stop the search CF>> immediately. The CPU load is rather high, memory CF>> consumption went up to 44.240 kB. Nothing serious, the CF>> search is done in about two minutes in a ~1 GB mailbase. > Ah - so it's not that it doesn't stop, it's that it doesn't respond > immediately. You're right. If I set the process priority on "low" TB still doesn't react faster. I wondered how I could figure out if the search was terminated the regular way or the forced one, since there is no such hint. All I get is a message saying "1 messages found". But I searched for "beta" and there should have been much more. So I suppose that the command was delayed for some reason. Maybe because TB had to decrypt my mails? > It does stop before the end of the search though? Yes I think so. The only 1 message gave me the hint. > I suspect if the CPU load is high it's merely a delay with the 'stop' > instruction being acted upon then. A delay of about two minutes that ends with no message like "search aborted on user request" is a little annoying. I think it would be better that TB shows a hint. -- kind regards Charlene Ferrara mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.73 Release Candidate 1 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Skype: charleneferrara ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.73 rc 1 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
