Hello Benedict,

On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 11:59:18 +0000 GMT (29/11/2006, 18:59 +0700 GMT),
Benedict Allen wrote:

SPV>> I guess that the Nov 20, 2006 announcement of 3.86.06 BETA
SPV>> wasn't completely accurate, then.  I would think that an
SPV>> announced BETA (as opposed to all of the recent ALPHA BETAs
SPV>> -- whatever the heck those are) *should* be found by the
SPV>> update checker (when 'check for betas' is enabled, as mine
SPV>> is).

An alpha version is an in-house testing version. You won't have access
to it, only paid employees do. The moment it is released to voluntary
outside real-time users (like on this list), it automatically becomes
a beta version. By definition.

There is no such thing as an "alpha beta" apart from Ritlabs'
terminology, but I have even heard of gammas once. Let's confuse the
testers all the way to omegas, I'd say. We might have to recite the
whole Greek alphabet in one line, though.

SPV>> May RIT just isn't telling their server about the updates
SPV>> they've been releasing?

BA> Last I heard that had turned it off.

That's bad news. I wish betas (which may be mistakenly be called
alphas) and release versions would be available for easy download in
this useful feature.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Blamestorming: Sitting around in a group discussing why a deadline was
missed or a project failed, and who was responsible.
http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/

Message reply created with The Bat! 3.85.03
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2



________________________________________________________
 Current beta is 3.86.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Reply via email to