·-------------------------------------------------------·-Date-------· | VA, <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [1] | 2007-02-27 | ·-------------------------------------------------------·------------· [Reply to: »Ian A. White« · 2007-02-27 · 21:44 h (CET)]
Hello, Ian! > I believe that this is working as it should in strict computer > logic. > The condition cannot be evaluated as true because there is nothing > to evaluate if the Reply-To: field is not present. As it evaluates > as nil, it does nothing. From this point of view you are right, so it is indeed a feature and *no* bug. ;-) Thanks. Cheers! VA -- [1] Direct eMail without [tbb] in subject line will end in Nirvana! Using The Bat! 3.98.1 [Pro] on Windows XP Service Pack 2. »A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof was to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.« - Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001), »Mostly Harmless« ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.96.15 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
