Hello Maxim, > If you think that we should make these messages more clear and > concise, please feel free to edit this file and send back to list.
Let's take the case "when the CPU doesn’t support hardware-based DEP" -- I think it would be justified to add a clear statement just before "Hardware-based DEP can be used on system processors...". I'd write someting like "Your computer’s system processor (CPU) seems to doesn't have support for hardware-based DEP." Then I'd put a paragraph "Hardware-based DEP can be used on system processors ... such as Core 2" only I would shorten it. I don't think it makes sense to use technical code-names such as EMT64, provided that these names don't function among most of average end-users. Alternatively after "Hardware-based DEP can be used on system processors (CPU) that support the “Execute Disable” (XD) function, also called as “No Execute” (NX) memory protect." I'd just add a link "List of processors supported" and place all that detailed info about processors in a pop-up box or sth. -- Krzysztof Trybowski Gadu-Gadu: 1458144 --- Skype: trybowski AQQ: 141062 --- ICQ: 4350719 --- gpg key-id: 0xC937B0F2 Using The Bat! 3.99.8 [reg] under Windows XP 5.1 build 2600. ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.99.21 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
