On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <r...@sisk.pl> wrote:

> On Monday, July 29, 2013 04:18:22 PM Ben Guthro wrote:
> >
> > On 07/29/2013 04:21 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Monday, July 29, 2013 01:14:14 PM Ben Guthro wrote:
> > >> Register for the extended sleep callback from acpi.
> > >> As tboot currently does not support the reduced hardware sleep
> > >> interface, fail this extended call.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Ben Guthro <benjamin.gut...@citrix.com>
> > >> Cc: tboot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > >> Cc: Gang Wei <gang....@intel.com>
> > >> Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.w...@oracle.com>
> > >> ---
> > >>  arch/x86/kernel/tboot.c |   12 ++++++++++++
> > >>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tboot.c
> > >> index addf7b5..760f431 100644
> > >> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/tboot.c
> > >> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tboot.c
> > >> @@ -301,6 +301,17 @@ static int tboot_sleep(u8 sleep_state, u32
> pm1a_control, u32 pm1b_control)
> > >>    return 0;
> > >>  }
> > >>
> > >> +static int tboot_extended_sleep(u8 sleep_state, u32 val_a, u32 val_b)
> > >> +{
> > >> +  if (!tboot_enabled())
> > >> +          return 0;
> > >> +
> > >> +  pr_warning("tboot is not able to suspend on platforms with"
> > >> +             " reduced hardware sleep (ACPIv5). Please contact"
> > >> +             " tboot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net mailing list.");
> > >> +  return -1;
> > >
> > > Please use a meaningful error code here.  For example -ENODEV.
> >
> > Would AE_NOT_IMPLEMENTED be more appropriate?
> >
> > include/acpi/acexcep.h:
> > #define AE_NOT_IMPLEMENTED              EXCEP_ENV (0x000E)
>
> This is not an ACPI error. :-)
>

Good point.
-ENODEV it is, then.

I'll respin tomorrow morning, to allow for anyone else who wishes to
comment on the series.

Thanks for the review

Ben


>
> Rafael
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Get your SQL database under version control now!
> Version control is standard for application code, but databases havent
> caught up. So what steps can you take to put your SQL databases under
> version control? Why should you start doing it? Read more to find out.
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=49501711&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> tboot-devel mailing list
> tboot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tboot-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get your SQL database under version control now!
Version control is standard for application code, but databases havent 
caught up. So what steps can you take to put your SQL databases under 
version control? Why should you start doing it? Read more to find out.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=49501711&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
tboot-devel mailing list
tboot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tboot-devel

Reply via email to