Hello Januk and Allie, First of all, thanks a lot for your great help. Hope I haven't been too much of a pain in the ... bottom...
I'll snif on the Net to find more about Regular Expressions and get to work with it... If you have a couple of good sites to recommand, feel free to do so :-) Once more, thanks a lot to both of you. Now... On 05/10/2001, at 06:02, you wrote about almost working...: JA> I've been trying to get a working macro too, and this one is a tough JA> one. I think the hard part is that everything is variable, so there JA> are some weird interactions. The subject could be any one of the JA> following: JA> (subject) JA> [Flamer]: (subject) JA> [Flamer]: Re: (subject) JA> Re: [Flamer]: (subject) JA> Re: [Flamer]: Re: (subject) JA> I think that's all of them, except for mutations where "fwd" replaces JA> "re". However, those are all of the same form. This is what I've JA> gotten, and it seems to work: It does work actually... Well... It didn't at first, but I found out that it was because you wrote "flamer" in English indstead of in Danish (flammer)... You'll have to work on you Danish :-) Anyway... It works just fine... :-) Now... if I want to adapt it to the "&%¤"¤ Outlook Express, where it writes an 'SV:' in front instead of the 'RE:' Can I just replace the Re in the expression with Sv? Does case of characters matter? I mean: Is there a difference between SV or Sv ? May I ask two questions? Well... I do anyway :-) 1. What does the Fwd in the expression means? Does it mean that it should work if people Forward something and there is Fwd instead of Re it'll work too? 2. Do you guy ever sleep? -- Regards Cyril ... If you cannot convince them, confuse them www.malka.com - www.malkadesign.com ICQ: 3294413 -- ______________________________________________________ Archives : http://tbtech.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
