Hi Steve,

on Tuesday, November 23, 1999, 2:33:19 AM GMT+0800, Steve Lamb wrote:



SL> Monday, November 22, 1999, 6:15:22 AM, Thomas wrote:
>> You mean a switch like a %SkipHeader macro?

SL>     That would work.  I'd actually like to see the current behavior of the
SL> reply template changed so that it, too, does not skip the header input but
SL> allow something like this to let the user decide.

OK, so by default the cursor should always go into the header, even if
there is data (TO/Subject/...) already. Unless there is a %SkipHeader
macro. This defines the default as opposite to what I was thinking of,
but I get your point.

However, what if there is no To recipient but a %SkipHeader macro, should the 
%SkipHeader
macro be ignored? Or how to you suggest to deal with that situation?

-- 

Thanks for expl,
Thomas.  

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.38 Beta/3
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998  
on a Pentium II/350 MHz.



-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to