Hello Steve & other fellow The Bat User Discussion List members,
Friday, May 05, 2000, 4:45:04 PM, you wrote:
SL> And to think, in another thread just a day or two ago people
SL> were trying to tell me to trust RITLABS not to include anything
SL> that would bloat the product.
Without flagging, the only way to imbue a message with a specific
importance was to either park it or to file it in another folder. I
haven't yet installed (just downloaded) the final v. 1.42 yet, but I
hope the color coding uses a five (rather than three) level scheme,
in order to more fully differentiate those messages requiring or
deserving follow up.
IMO, flagging was a missing basic item that I myself had asked for
starting with v.1.35. The flagging is bien venido in my book.
(Notice I hadn't bothered to upgrade since v 1.39 - now I will).
Douglas
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
