Hello Chris,

On Wednesday, August 10, 2022 you wrote:

CW> 10 August 2022

CW> I am having filtering problems but do not understand why, as before
CW> upgrading to v10. I saw no issues. Here are the headers for a message that
CW> does not get filtered correctly, it is instead left placed in my new mail 
folder.

CW>

CW> Return-Path: <time-nuts-bounces+chris=chriswilson...@lists.febo.com>
CW> Delivered-To: ch...@chriswilson.tv
CW> Received: from shcp19.hosting.zen.net.uk
CW>         by shcp19.hosting.zen.net.uk with LMTP
CW>         id oCtmCmAB9GIyoBcAq/KeZA
CW>         (envelope-from 
<time-nuts-bounces+chris=chriswilson...@lists.febo.com>)
CW>         for <ch...@chriswilson.tv>; Wed, 10 Aug 2022 19:05:04 +0000
CW> Return-path: <time-nuts-bounces+chris=chriswilson...@lists.febo.com>
CW> Envelope-to: ch...@chriswilson.tv
CW> Delivery-date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 19:05:04 +0000
CW> Received: from mm2.emwd.com ([172.104.30.75]:38858)
CW>         by shcp19.hosting.zen.net.uk with esmtps  (TLS1.2) tls 
TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
CW>         (Exim 4.95)
CW>         (envelope-from 
<time-nuts-bounces+chris=chriswilson...@lists.febo.com>)
CW>         id 1oLr0r-006WDm-Fy
CW>         for ch...@chriswilson.tv;
CW>         Wed, 10 Aug 2022 19:05:04 +0000
CW> Received: from mm2.emwd.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
CW>         by mm2.emwd.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBDF338105E
CW>         for <ch...@chriswilson.tv>; Wed, 10 Aug 2022 15:04:20 -0400 (EDT)
CW> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=emwd.com; s=harmony;
CW>         t=1660158260; bh=rlM+N6OmEi+V8ajTnZ+5o8Ps4IRzuQaJYXc0s/ZpJaA=;
CW>         h=To:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Reply-To:Subject:List-Id:
CW>          List-Archive:List-Help:List-Owner:List-Post:List-Subscribe:
CW>          List-Unsubscribe:From:Cc:From;
CW>         b=PxOf3o4fLdfYsL07MliOfUtoCv/+kdGaN8G7QC41fzXbZ77to1hqfDYrva6kmjjJW
CW>          Uc54X2ZpUwejk/DY5g5s7BAyqwclNIebCfMLHFhZlcQZ5PDdrWIXpJz0y4ATrn3qX+
CW>          rIX0whPE1GvIU3rhb3ojUQHh6yzKS4QtO1X2VBipf8Aaptic1Uf/UJgMqWizQzBVRW
CW>          qphHJa7Ucj3GXb6DdQrCnnqtUGbJBRlzvpoKxW2uMIBcHIaK2ksZZVWbszai1Mipls
CW>          JaN1y7DXDV712jf5CWSQiscehh39hvjTIwMFEv1btb4zE9XfC2wmKbXFALOI2esY7G
CW>          sh284EgJdvotA==
CW> Received: from mail.dfm.dk (mail.dfm.dk [87.116.22.157])
CW>         by mm2.emwd.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50191383C92
CW>         for <time-n...@lists.febo.com>; Wed, 10 Aug 2022 09:06:04 -0400 
(EDT)
CW> Received: from DELPHI.dfmdom.local (172.16.10.35) by DELPHI.dfmdom.local
CW>  (172.16.10.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2,
CW>  cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.986.26; Wed, 10 Aug
CW>  2022 15:06:02 +0200
CW> Received: from DELPHI.dfmdom.local ([fe80::54bd:62df:5089:b62d]) by
CW>  DELPHI.dfmdom.local ([fe80::54bd:62df:5089:b62d%3]) with mapi id
CW>  15.02.0986.026; Wed, 10 Aug 2022 15:06:02 +0200
CW> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
CW>         <time-n...@lists.febo.com>
CW> Thread-Topic: [time-nuts] dial-up time source for NTP
CW> Thread-Index: AQHYrFPkZbUzZdYmC0ymMN5KmwhDSa2n+Z0A
CW> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 13:06:02 +0000
CW> Message-ID: <2566071.k3LOHGUjKi@dfm-3333-jap>
CW> References: 
<CAAR3e4NQN85pfG4Yb39OMK2QLK__rpWM7e6BCXj1nck3=mk...@mail.gmail.com>
CW> In-Reply-To:
CW> <CAAR3e4NQN85pfG4Yb39OMK2QLK__rpWM7e6BCXj1nck3=mk...@mail.gmail.com>
CW> Accept-Language: en-US, da-DK
CW> Content-Language: en-US
CW> X-MS-Has-Attach: 
CW> X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
CW> x-originating-ip: [87.116.22.146]
CW> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
CW> Content-ID: <89f4daf707e83246b45d0b8376e8f...@dfm.dk>
CW> MIME-Version: 1.0
CW> X-MailFrom: j...@dfm.dk
CW> X-Mailman-Rule-Hits: emergency
CW> X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved
CW> Message-ID-Hash: 53I7WFNCQTW44I2FE22MO2LQLTNZPXBD
CW> X-Message-ID-Hash: 53I7WFNCQTW44I2FE22MO2LQLTNZPXBD
CW> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 15:01:40 -0400
CW> X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.3
CW> Precedence: list
CW> Reply-To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement 
<time-n...@lists.febo.com>
CW> Subject: [time-nuts] Re: dial-up time source for NTP
CW> List-Id: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement 
<time-nuts.lists.febo.com>
CW> Archived-At:
CW> 
<https://lists.febo.com/archives/list/time-n...@lists.febo.com/message/53I7WFNCQTW44I2FE22MO2LQLTNZPXBD/>
CW> List-Archive: 
<https://lists.febo.com/archives/list/time-n...@lists.febo.com/>
CW> List-Help: <mailto:time-nuts-requ...@lists.febo.com?subject=help>
CW> List-Owner: <mailto:time-nuts-ow...@lists.febo.com>
CW> List-Post: <mailto:time-n...@lists.febo.com>
CW> List-Subscribe: <mailto:time-nuts-j...@lists.febo.com>
CW> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:time-nuts-le...@lists.febo.com>
CW> From: =?utf-8?q?J=C3=BCrgen_Appel_via_time-nuts?= <time-n...@lists.febo.com>
CW> Cc: =?utf-8?B?SsO8cmdlbiBBcHBlbA==?= <j...@dfm.dk>
CW> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
CW> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4
CW> X-Spam-Score: -53
CW> X-Spam-Bar: -----
CW> X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system 
"shcp19.hosting.zen.net.uk",
CW>  has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
CW>  message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
CW>  similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
CW>  root\@localhost for details.
CW>  Content preview:  Dear Discussion of precise time and frequency 
measurement,
CW>     On Tuesday, 9 August 2022 21:52:45 CEST Avro125 via time-nuts wrote: > 
I’m
CW>     wondering if someone would be willing to assist me in getting NTP to > 
reference
CW>     time from NIST (Colorado) or NRC (Ottawa) via a dial-up modem. > Either 
as
CW>     a primary source, or as a failover i [...] 
CW>  Content analysis details:   (-5.4 points, 5.0 required)
CW>   pts rule name              description
CW>  ---- ---------------------- 
--------------------------------------------------
CW>  -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
CW>                              [score: 0.0000]
CW>  -2.5 RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W    RBL: Sender listed in HOSTKARMA-WHITE
CW>                         [172.104.30.75 listed in 
hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com]
CW>  -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
CW>  -0.1 DKIM_VALID             Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK 
signature
CW>   0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not 
necessarily
CW>                              valid
CW>  -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE   No description available.
CW>  -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI     Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
CW>                              manager
CW> X-Spam-Flag: NO

CW> My filter : Sender contains time-nuts

CW>             OR: Recipient contains time nuts

CW> Action : Move to the folder \\Zen Account\Amateur Radio\Time Nuts Forum

CW> This folder exists, the filter is active and works on some messages from 
that particular forum

CW> Thanks for any ideas.
CW>   


Have you tried any other options besides "sender"?

-- 
Regards,
Jack
Central Alabama USA

The Bat! E-Mail Client by Ritlabs version 6.0.12
Windows 10 Home Build 9200


________________________________________________
Current version is 9.1.18 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to