Hi Johannes,
On 10 August 2000 at 15:15:52 GMT +0200 (which was 14:15 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "OT? S/MIME & PGP (inspired by: Re[2]: List server rules)":
>> No, what I mean is, it depends of the inormation content. If a
>> message has 1.2K without the s/mime and is blown up by 300% for the
>> signature, it's not nomral. If a message has 10K of information,
>> that's OK.
JMP> Mhhh. Perhaps :) But as now S/MIME is part of TB, it's usual and will
JMP> get heavily used on these support lists.
It won't.
As Wolfgang has been trying to explain to you, it has become a
moderatorial decision that S/MIME signatures in their current form
(which incorporates the key) constitute attachments which are not
permitted on TBUDL and only permitted on TBBETA for test and
demonstration purposes (and then only when within reason and of a
reasonable size). OTOH PGP signatures are less inflationary and are
permitted.
Anyone ignoring these restrictions repeatedly will be barred from the
list.
Have I made the position clearer?
--
Cheers,
.\\arck
Marck D. Pearlstone, Consultant Software Engineer
Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA
www: http://www.silverstones.com
PGP key: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=GET%20MARCKKEY>
*-----------------------------------------------
| Using The Bat! 1.46 Beta/3 S/N 14F4B4B2
| under Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998
*-----------------------------------------------
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
