Hello A. Curtis Martin,
On Wed, 18 Oct 2000 22:19:07  -0500 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, October 19, 2000, 10:19:07 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
A. Curtis Martin wrote:


> On Wed, 18 Oct 2000 18:59:15 -0400, Rich wrote:

A>>> Very interesting. How much RAM does your system pack?

R>> 256MB also......

3*128 mb strips, P3-700 crunching at around 900....
14 accounts, not all in use, main one has about 20000 messages.

> Wow! That was unexpected. <g>

A>>> For me TB! is usually hovering between 9 and 12MB of RAM, but I have
A>>> a lot of RAM ... 256MB. TB!'s RAM usage tends to be somewhat
A>>> dynamic.

R>> Seems that way....Mine stays pretty stable, It's never been over 5mb
R>> on my machine. Windows 2000 with SP1 with 256MB.

SP1 here as well.

> Wow! That's even more unexpected.  A couple more things then. How many
> accounts do you have and approximately how many messages do you have in
> them? Do you store your attachments as a part of your messages or
> separately in the attachments folder?

My attachments are separate

> I personally store attachments in message bodies and I have three
> accounts with a total of 40K messages. A couple of my folders contain
> over 6,000 messages.

> I'm quite convinced that the disparity in RAM usage has to do with
> having to do with the accounts/folder structure, and message bases.



Best regards,
 
tracer


-- 

Using theBAT 1.47 Beta/5 with Windows NT
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ICQ: on request 
Website: www.phuketcomputers.com
Our special website hosting/mailservers are now operational

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org


Reply via email to