On Thursday, November 09, 2000, 10:48:42 AM, Thomas wrote:
>>>> OTOH, I have a feeling that would compromise the way TB V1
>>>> handles the mail-base and would have to be a V2 wish=list item.
ML>>> Looks like we have different ideas in mind.
MDP>> Not necessarily.
> Then why do you say the mail-base would have to be different? If I
> understand Ming-Li correctly, he is only talking about how it is
> displayed, not stored. I fully agree with Ming-Li (if what he meanz is
> what I understand <g>).
I think you understand me correctly. <g>
MDP>> I was suggesting that it would be nice to see the message as written
MDP>> with the signature showing up as an external phenomenon.
> I agree, if you mean like it is done with the S/Mime sigs now. I don't
> wish to see the digital sig in the body of the email.
> Only point I would like to change is that these icons should be in the
> grey header area rather than taking up as much space as "real"
> attachments, like they do now.
I have no objection to that IF TB is smart enough to show it in the
message body pane (either as a pseudo-attachment or by, say,
coloring the border of the pane with a different color), for I
usually turn off the grey header area.
BTW, long time no see, Thomas. Welcome back! :)
--
Best regards,
Ming-Li
The Bat! 1.48 Beta/4 | Win2k SP1
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
