Hello Marck,
Saturday, January 20, 2001, 11:55:33 AM, you wrote:
GFS>> This is a knee jerk work around. How about giving the user the
GFS>> option to use hard returns or not.
MDP> There is no choice. Hard returns get used at some point. At least in
MDP> TB that point is "up front". In all other clients it's either behind
MDP> the scenes or at the whim of a routing MTA. Whichever, it's out of the
MDP> control of the message originator. Give me control over random anarchy
MDP> any day. What you propose as an option is only possible when the
MDP> routing is known.
So why do so many other clients handle this so much better?
MDP> The "attach a text file" work-around is *not* knee jerk. It is 100%
MDP> the correct solution.
So if I were to use a text-editor than attach it, I might as well
not use TB and route directly through sendmail, for it is my opinion
that the editor is 90% of what makes the client.
--
Best regards,
George mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**********************************************
*Thawte authorized WOT Notary * ICQ: 122492 *
**********************************************
Santa's elves are just a bunch of subordinate Clauses.
Finger: [EMAIL PROTECTED] for keys
--
______________________________________________________
Archives : <http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com>
Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
TBTech List: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
