-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001 07:45:16 -0500, Jan wrote these words of wisdom:
EF>>> I've been a programmer for 20 years, and in my way of thinking
EF>>> this statement would cause the contents of %ABofromFIRSTNAME to
EF>>> be replaced with the contents of %OFROMFNAME.
JR> Is it correct for me to say that the ABnnnPPP macros are
JR> structured so that if they encounter nothing they can continue to
JR> look for other data, i.e. %ABofromFIRSTNAME="%OFROMFNAME" & that
JR> makes them unusual? I just want to make sure I understand this.
It's really just the syntax that's being criticised. '=' means 'equal
to'. That's what it means when used in all other macros except in the
context of address book macros where it means 'if no value found then
='.
- --
@~@========================================================@~@
| A. Curtis Martin [List Moderator TB(UDL|BETA|TECH)] |
| PGPKey: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendAlliePGPKey |
@_@ (Opinions given are mine and not those of RITLABS) @_@
__________________________________________________________
TB! v1.49e | Windows NT 5.00.2195 (Service Pack 1)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Digitally signed for sender and message authentication.
iQA/AwUBOnhXnlfJ62ArBxfiEQLSCgCfWZUH0BT8rDOZIjoRwNBMVIoMkuAAn0Uh
waq0/D5OIg18U7xxyK8rHL1M
=KVrB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
______________________________________________________
Archives : <http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com>
Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
TBTech List: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
