-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello Nick Andriash !
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001 09:36:35 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was 12.02.2001, 18:36 (GMT+0100) where I live, you wrote:
[...]
> So you are saying that you checked his message and the signature verified
> as "Good"? If so, then I don't understand why it shows "Bad" on my
> machine, and can think no reason what, why or where the message itself
> would have been tampered with.
> Are you *sure* you get a "Good" signature on his first message in this
> thread? Anyone else getting a good signature? I'm using PGP 7.0.3 but that
> shouldn't make any difference at all. As you can see, your signature
> checks out just fine:
Nick, the funny thing is that I get a GOOD signature when I use TB-plugin
and a BAD when I use PGPTray. The key was downloaded by PGP; ID: 0x8313390B
Fingerprint:D554 FB2E 50A7 AB9B 7CC1 18BC 3839 497A 8313 390B
*** PGP Signature Status: bad
*** Signer: Krister Ekstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Invalid)
*** Signed: 12.02.01 11:10:11
*** Verified: 12.02.01 19:11:04
*** BEGIN PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE ***
I can't explain that. It is definitely the same message, just another way
of verifying.
[...]
I was able reproduce this again
- --
Best regards,
Gerd
======================================
Using The Bat! Version 1.49
PGP-Keys on request mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=send_key
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
In a Copenhagen airline ticket office: We take your bags
and send them in all directions.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Digitally signed for authentication purposes ! Gerd Ewald
iQA/AwUBOogbIUy/sHrVbGGHEQKFIgCfYtTuMTjZ8zYCMNrS13FXPi9sME0AoNUm
OBev4lAdvyLhra+0FaghrBX6
=+oTq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
______________________________________________________
Archives : <http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com>
Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
TBTech List: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
