Hello Sunday, February 25, 2001, 11:34:31 PM, someone claiming to be [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Thank for very much for your reply, John - but did you read to the > bottom of the post you are replying to ;-) Sorry, too lazy to read that far <g> -- Regards John Phillips Sydney, Australia Hamster 1.3.22.1 Bat! 1.49 Windows 98 4.10 Build 2222 A Sony Vaio Notebook PCG-505TS Pentium 300 64meg ram It's deja vu all over again. -- ______________________________________________________ Archives : <http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com> Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> TBTech List: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
- Re: The Bat compared to Becky and Calypso John Phillips
- Re: The Bat compared to Becky and Calypso Jannik Lindquist
- Re: The Bat compared to Becky and Calypso Dierk Haasis
- Re: The Bat compared to Becky and Calypso Karin Spaink
- Re: The Bat compared to Becky and Calypso Dierk Haasis
- Agent & PGP (was: The Bat compared t... Karin Spaink
- Re: Agent & PGP (was: The Bat c... A Curtis Martin
- Re: The Bat compared to Becky and Calypso Jannik Lindquist
- Re[2]: The Bat compared to Becky and Calypso John Phillips
- Re: Re[2]: The Bat compared to Becky and... Jannik Lindquist
- Re: The Bat compared to Becky and C... John Phillips
- Re: The Bat compared to Becky a... Dierk Haasis
- Re[2]: The Bat compared to Becky and Calypso IronHand
- Re: Re[2]: The Bat compared to Becky and Calypso Jannik Lindquist
- Re: The Bat compared to Becky and Calypso Ming-Li
- Re: The Bat compared to Becky and Calypso Nick Andriash
- Re: The Bat compared to Becky and Calypso Jannik Lindquist