Hello Thomas,
Tuesday, July 17, 2001, 6:25:14 AM, you wrote:
TF> Hi Miles,
TF> On Tue, 17 Jul 2001 06:17:35 -0400GMT (17/07/2001, 18:17 +0800GMT),
TF> Miles Alexander wrote:
MA>> Scratch the part about not getting TIME values. I will always get TIME
MA>> values, however, when the Created and Received DATE fields are
MA>> missing, the TIME left-justifies and I end up sorting *some* on actual
MA>> date and *some* on TIME.
TF> For those without a date, they are from today. They will have a date
TF> tomorrow.
Are you serious?
So: any transactions that are made *same* day are treated w/o a date
and *just* the time?
May I ask why this is done and how I should sort *if* the actual date
is missing and replaced with the TIME?
--
Best regards,
Miles mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
______________________________________________________
Archives : <http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com>
Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
TBTech List: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
