-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

@ 18:02:22 +0100 [ Sun, 28 Oct 2001], Jernej Simončič [JS]
thoughtfully wrote the following:
...
SC>> Where image has more then 256 colors. Else use jpg .

JS> Some time ago, (on TBBETA IIRC), I made a comparison between PNG and
JS> JPG. Results were:
JS> PNG (24bit): 25 kB
JS> JPG (95%): 135 kB (and it looked worse than PNG)
JS> JPG: 25 kB (very low quality, wanted to show what happens - text was
JS> unreadable)
JS> Then somebody converted that PNG file to 256 colors, and it came out
JS> at 17kB.

JS> BTW: if you wish I can make these screenshots again.

For images which don't need more than 256 colours, png format is
great. So for capturing application windows, cartoons and the like,
png is the way to go. However, for photos or images carrying more than
256 colours, jpg seems the way to go.

- --
ŠAllie C Martin  --  List Moderator and fellow end-user
  PGPKey- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=PGPPubKey1
   [MUA: TB! v1.54/10  (*)  OS: Win2K SP 2]
__
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Sealed for Security

iEYEARECAAYFAjvcXnQACgkQV8nrYCsHF+IDsgCfV85REZfMHDjCGG3v4YUa3RDR
qfoAnjEz8EaWcHlp+YxOIS+HTVUREaDb
=MQVr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



-- 
________________________________________________________
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ        : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 

Reply via email to