Hi Peter, On Sun, 9 Dec 2001 19:52:11 +0100GMT (10/12/2001, 02:52 +0800GMT), Peter Palmreuther wrote:
PP> The '>' is not a thing of "let's annoy some people" but there were PP> times and software that _needed_ it for secure message storing and PP> re-retrieving. Note the past tense. PP> So if there're some 'old' servers that run such a software you can't PP> do anything against this except changing server or software. And we PP> all should know, this is a realy expensiv thing to do and therefore PP> maybe this server will run until they have to be substituted anyway. Is it so expensive, though? PP> If I had a 'Pro' account I'd expect them to make sure my mails reach PP> me uneffected, because it could be important in case of e.g. a PGP or PP> S/MIME signature. GMX does add the character into mails received via my pro-account. :-( PP> In any other case it's a pure cosmetic thing and for 'Free' users PP> ind the meaning of 'non paying' I think it'S an acceptable PP> 'limitation' in function for this great and nevertheless free PP> service, even as it ain't a 'real' limitation. Yhey do change the contents of my mail. IMHO it is not acceptable in any case (free or not). -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Anmeldung unter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message reply created with The Bat! 1.53t under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 on a Pentium II/350 MHz. -- ________________________________________________________ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
