-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Ottar,
On 05 January 2002 at 00:39:27 [GMT+0100] (which was 23:39 where I live) Ottar Grimstad wrote to Marck D Pearlstone and made these points: > I agree that plain text is the best for most emails, but rich text > is out there, and _sometimes_ it can be nice to have the > possibility. I know what you're saying. I'll never (and I mean never) use it myself, but I can see the requirement. > If it is beeing made available with v2, then I will for 99% stick > to plain text anyway, but I think it will be nice, not sad, to > have the possibility the few times I need it. "Sadly" is about how many people go over the top as soon as they get their hands on rich text formatting. Suddenly everyone's sending HTML mails (and it is HTML mail we're talking about here, not merely RTF, which is at the same time both a proprietary and a widely variant standard). That's sad - I'd rather it didn't have to be encouraged. At the same time, as I say, I see the need. The even bigger need here is the need to get a tick in the "features" column in comparative reviews. That one I can't argue with, not for one second <g>. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- List moderator ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ \ BrainStorm - free thinking - www: http://www.brainstormsw.com / \ PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com / · TB! v1.54 Beta/24-14F4B4B2 on Windows NT 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 · -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8N5GbOeQkq5KdzaARAsE5AKDH2FaeHTZlLymNxrBwPGbBcl4ErQCeLleC QjSS5j25XSbznjUPTj8ai8g= =274e -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- ________________________________________________________ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
