It was foretold that on 14-1-2002 @ 22:20:39 GMT-0500 (which was 4:20 where I live) Rick Reumann wrote and spread these wise comments on "[OT sort of] PocoMail- was Re[4]: HTML based emails":
RR> On Sunday, January 13, 2002, 4:24:39 PM, GeekMaster wrote: G>> "on the fly" inline HTML message rendering. At this moment, I'm composing this from Opera 6's e-mail G>> client, because being integrated into the browser, it's so very convenient. Generally though, I use G>> PocoMail. In some ways, it's less powerful than The Bat, but nobody works harder than PocoMail's G>> author at accomodating user requests in the mail client. HTML is nothing new, and despite the wishes of G>> some, it's not going to go away. When The Bat makes the leap into the "new world", I will almost G>> certainly use it again, as so much of everything else that it does is virtually perfect. RR> I'm just curious if anyone could give RR> me some of the benefits/drawbacks of using PocoMail vs The Bat! I'm RR> a registered user of The Bat! that came from Pegasus so I'm just RR> curious what some users of it think of it compared to The Bat!. If RR> this is too off topic I apologize and feel free to mail me off RR> list. Mail clients interest me and I'll probably download pocomail RR> just for the fun of it, but figured I'd get some opinions first if RR> anyone had any. RR> -- RR> Rick RR> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] RR> "If you're a young Mafia gangster out on your first date, I bet it's RR> real embarrassing if someone tries to kill you." RR> -Jack Handey -- Best regards, Luc mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.53d on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Thought for the day : "If love is blind, why is lingerie so popular?" -- ________________________________________________________ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
