Hello Jonathan Angliss, On Wed, 8 May 2002 04:57:58 -0500 (CDT) GMT your local time, which was Wednesday, May 8, 2002, 4:57:58 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Jonathan Angliss wrote: > On Wed, 8 May 2002, Marck D Pearlstone wrote: >> Hmm this is confusing for me. Let's work it through - we're talking >> about a beta plug-in for post-release fix versions of The Bat! only >> available for download from the beta site. That's two beta's and one >> release. Arithmetic says it's a beta issue. > Another confusing thing... if we are only able to download up to > 1.60i(j?)... and there is a known bug that stops the AVG working with > 1.60e-j... then what is the point on announcing the new beta release of te > AVG to us... when there'd be no point trying to test it? As this isnt the beta newslist, why not ask these and related questions there? At present BOTH lists have the same questions about betas which kind of defeats the purpose of having the beta list and means one has to check and search 2 lists for specific problems. Mark, why not make beta questions on the normal list a dead horse??? -- Best regards, tracer Using theBAT 1.60j mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] C.C.S. Associates FAX (USA): (208) 460-3753 pgp 6.5.3 : 0x909D9B10 ________________________________________________________ Current Ver: 1.60i FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
