-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Mark Wieder [MW] wrote:
...
MW> It's based on having lost months' worth of emails from corrupted
MW> message bases in the past. I try to play it safe these days and
MW> email folders with their contents constantly changing don't seem
MW> like particularly safe repositories for things I care about

It's perplexing that you lose mail often enough that you've lost
confidence in the mail base reliability short of a hardware failure.

I've lost mail only on two occasions. Once when running securebat in
its early days. The other was during a hard disk failure on my laptop.
I've since had the drive replaced.

I do daily backups of my mailbases just to be sure. It's done using
a WinRAR command line based batch file that does a archive
synchronisation and updating with my mailbase. I feel pretty secure
with that arrangement and hardly ever delete mail unless it's spam,
duplicates or obvious duds.

You're using Win2k which makes it even that more perplexing that your
mailbase reliability is so poor.

- --
 -=Allie C Martin=-
List Moderator | TB! v1.60n | Windows XP Pro
PGP/GPG Public Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=2B0717E2
_________________________________________________________________
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQE8+TXyV8nrYCsHF+IRAvtDAJ91KmINPuTgWkBMJeffi63urtkQ+QCgrCIs
vxMnZngoxMBIJsp+9bt/Weo=
=RTbI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



________________________________________________________
Current Ver: 1.60m
FAQ        : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com

Reply via email to