Hello Roelof Otten, On Mon, 1 Jul 2002 00:30:53 +0200 GMT your local time, which was Monday, July 1, 2002, 5:30:53 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Roelof Otten wrote: > Hallo Jonathan, > On Sun, 30 Jun 2002 09:29:33 -0500GMT (30-6-02, 16:29 +0200GMT, where > I live), you wrote: JA>> You can use delivery, and receipt confirmation, but only delivery JA>> is actually respoonded too all the time. Receipt confirmation can JA>> be skipped by the user. > Only bad configured mailservers respond to delivery confirmation > requests and clients should not respond to them without a user > confirmation. personally I would have more trust in the computer telling me it has arrived then the person I write... Obviously doesnt mean it has been READ but thats afterall not what a sender wants to know. If it ends up in the addressed mailbox, thats as far as normally my interest would go as it means that if he doesnt read it, its his mistake and not 100 whatever unexplainable things on the net... -- Best regards, tracer Using theBAT 1.60m mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED] C.C.S. Associates FAX (USA): (208) 460-3753 pgp 6.5.3 : 0x909D9B10 ________________________________________________________ Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
