Sh'mae Ricardo, On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, at 23:30:38 [GMT -0300] (03:30 where I live) you wrote:
RMR> yes, I do. And when I use IE instead of Opera, IE connects directly RMR> without Proxomitron, and I can't believe the amount of garbage I avoid RMR> using it :) Do you think there is any point of pushing TB! developers towards this - or some similar system for rendering HTML? Much as I despise HTML mail there is a great demand for it from some people - and if we have to have it, a nice package behind it verifying and validating it would be great. Basically seeing how anally-retentive TB! is in rendering received HTML, it would be very nice to see it do that magic on sent HTML. Then I wouldn't feel so nervous about it..... And why am I nervous. I admin (in the loosest sense of the word, as it is with that package) 500 Exchange users. With Outlook. ugh -- :[: a new-wales - http://www.new-wales.net :]: :[: Adam Rykala - [EMAIL PROTECTED] :]: :[: Public key - [EMAIL PROTECTED] :]: 20 August 2002, 03:31 :[: Emails in and out scanned with AntiVir Mail Gateway for Linux :]: My grandfather invented Cliff's Notes. It all started back in 1912 ... well, to make a long story short ... ________________________________________________________ Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html