Kevin Coates, [KC] wrote: KC> I find the "mid:"; info useful when reading replies, but the gmane KC> encryption breaks the sigs. It will be interesting to see how KC> others handle this. I always liked this feature in The Bat.
I don't use it anymore. :) I haven't used it for some time now. The only way to preserve your signature is to make sure that nothing in your message body will be encrypted by the server. Of course, there's always the copy to the mailing list users that will always be OK, so it's really up to you and what your priorities are, i.e., using a mid link in your introductions or having your signatures break when they arrive on the server. I note that my PGP/MIME signatures will have problems being verified by those using many news readers. However, I just noted that they verify fine using ThunderBird and Enigmail. KC> I suppose that I could use pgp/mime like you have here and then KC> the gmane message wouldn't display the broken pgp signature. The mid links would still be encrytped and this would break the PGP/MIME signatures. KC> BTW, I thought that pgp/mime was only allowed in the TBBeta Yahoo KC> Group. Has this changed? At the time we suggested that it be restricted to TBBETA, PGP/MIME was not yet supported by an official TB! release. Now that PGP/MIME support is well established there's no problem PGP/MIME signing your list messages since subscribers will be able to verify your signatures and it's a better signature type to use since all the unreadable stuff is not displayed in the viewer and attachments are added as part of the message that's signed/encrypted. -- -=[ Allie ]=- (List Moderator and fellow end-user) PGPKeys: http://key.ac-martin.com Running The Bat! v2.05 Beta/1 on WinXP Pro (SP1)
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________ Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
