Hello Peter Ouwehand & everyone else on 08-Nov-2004 at 22:29:52 (GMT +0100), you wrote:
> But I'm still somewhat puzzled as to why (here) the M$ .eml extension is > used when this option is set. I don't know that either, but one possible explanation may be compatibility: Outlook Express can't do a thing with *.msg files (according to something I googled, no warranty), but it can (as well as a number of other email programs) handle *.eml files. I did not find any information if the .eml format was indeed invented by Microsloth, or someone else; since TB exports .eml files as well, it maybe is an open format (or does Rit pay royalties to M$? I doubt it). -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) using TB! v3.0.2.6 on Windows XP Pro Service Pack 2 The concept is interesting and well-formed, but in order to earn better than a 'C,' the idea must be feasible. -- A Yale University management professor in response to Fred Smith paper proposing reliable overnight delivery service. (Smith went on to found Federal Express Corp.) ________________________________________________ Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
