Hello Andrew,

On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 01:38:06 +0000 (UTC) GMT (06/12/2004, 08:38 +0700 GMT),
Andrew wrote:

>> AMG> Curious as to how TB! does its duplicate message
>> AMG> search. Never had trouble with it before, but now...
>> 
>> IIRC on Message-ID

A> then it isn't working fully, or there are some other criteria in play. I 
checked
A> the RFC headers of some dupes and they had identical message IDs (also 
explains
A> why the sent folder never found any dupes, no Message ID).

AFAIK dupes are identified both message-ID and Date header. Yes, that
is the reason why dupes in the Sent folder are not detected. And TB
will find dupes only when they are in the same folder, but I guess you
know that.

For incoming messages, TB has never had problems finding the dupes
over here, regardless of whether a duplicate was moved to its current
location manually or by a filter.

A> Using TB! 3.0.1.33

OK, even though I use a v3, my wisdom usaully really applies to v1 and
v2, so take my posting with a bit of grain. It happened two or three
times on this list that what I said what not true for v3 any more, but
I don't recall any change with regards to dupes.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

I don't know the key to success, but the key to failure is trying to
please everybody. - Bill Cosby

Message reply created with The Bat! 3.0.2.4 Rush
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 2222 A 




________________________________________________
Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to