Hi Thomas,
The original quoted text below was written on 20/01/2005 16:56 my local time;
I can imagine that their date stamp is not according to the RFC.
As I'm sure most of their mail is system generated, I suspect something is missing somewhere.
Didn't come through, obviously. But what I would be more interested in is the headers of that message rather than a screenshot. Especially the Date header.
I forgot that TBUDL doesn't allow any attachments. If I get time tonight when I get home, I'll put some up on the internet and post the link.
Args. No Date header? Send the headers back to them for examination. I cannot fathom a server en route would strip a Date header, though. Sounds weird.
I've already written to them twice including a screen print. They said they couldn't open the attachment (.png) for security reasons, so I have to write to them and print out a copy of the screen print :-(
________________________________________________ Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
