On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 10:22:16 +0000, BJH wrote:

> On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 10:42:08 +0100, daRkSidE wrote:
> 
>> In data Thu, 3 Feb 2005 08:26:30 +0000, Barry Higginbottom ha scritto:
>> 
>>> d> You should wait for gmane authorization to post and you should receive
>>> d> by email, IIRC.
>>>      But I've already had that about three weeks ago?
>> 
>> I can't explain, I don't know exactly gmane mechanism. It was a long 
>> time I didn't post here, and, after having sent the reply to you, I've 
>> been required to authorize again. Dunno, try again posting or contact 
>> gmane staff.
> 
> OK, if I've solved this mystery then everyone will see this post via Gmane
> which apparently requires genuine email addresses so my
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wasn't allowed.

Very interesting, in Dialog my email came up as gobbledygook (see above)
but from TBudl in came through as intended as "barryh at nospam dot kentra
dot co dot uk"

-- 
Regards
Barry


________________________________________________
Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to