-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ."_)~~ ~( __ _"o Was another beautiful day, Wed, 02 Mar 2005, @ @ at 19:25:18 -0500, when David Calvarese wrote:
>> gpg: WARNING: signature digest conflict in message >> gpg: BAD signature from "David Calvarese >> >> And for this message of yours is same. >> >> I don't know if this relates to something specific to TB or not. > I'm not sure either... They're showing good sigs on my end when I look > in my sent items folder. Maybe because I'm using something other than > SHA-1 as a digest... I'll do this one with SHA and see. This one is OK, but also many of yours with RIPEMD160 digest. "Digest conflict"...interesting term... - -- Mica PGP key uploaded at: <http://pgp.mit.edu/> once just before breakfast [Earth LOG: 183 day(s) since v3.0 unleashing] OS: Windows 98 SE Micro Lite Professional IVa Enterprise Millennium with nestled ZipSlack(tm) 9.1 UMSDOS Linux, and with Bochs 2.1.1 with a small DLX Linux; and, for TB sometimes, Gentoo and Vector via Wine... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFCJ1EA9q62QPd3XuIRAidHAJ9N6iL6/ns/wZ0qu/9f5Zhpak39IQCeOFTy bYnBekSdbzz7L/Bq/2dm7DY= =81h3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ________________________________________________ Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
