Dear Tony, @20-May-2005, 17:48 Tony Boom [TB] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>> You got, Tony. Theory isn't bad, but not perfect. See: TB> Are you saying my signature is OK on TBUDL? It still doesn't even register TB> here as a signature. But - that's because of the footer and Mulberry being unable to unravel the resulting MIME-Muddle. The sig is there. The sig is good. Bad Mulberry! Bad Mulberry! Allie already told us this. -- Cheers -- //.arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator and fellow end user TB! v3.5 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2 '
pgpQYx4RtEWFw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________ Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
