Hallo Robert, On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 12:13:54 -0500GMT (19-11-2005, 18:13 +0100, where I live), you wrote:
>> %UsePGP%- >> %PGPMIME%- RD> Question on the mime part. I am using gpg 1.4.2 or is it 1.42, anyway, RD> i discovered if I put the macro %nopgpmime, then my %signcomplete RD> worked. Otherwise every *seemed* to clearsign the text but the hash RD> words and stuff at the bootom never got added. Not sure how I figured RD> to add that macro, but anyway, what are the factors concerning the RD> mime part of %pgpmime Actually, this message is PGP signed too. But what I'm using is PGP/MIME that means that the signature is added as an attachment not as an add-on to the text. I prefer PGP/MIME to inline signing, because it makes the body less cluttered. Depends a bit on your contact though. Not all mail clients support PGP/MIME, so when your contact uses Outlook, or Outlook Express then PGP/MIME is a big no. I'm using PGP mostly around these lists and TB supports it just fine, and with %PGPMIME and %NOPGPMIME you can force the behaviour in templates. In the editor you can set it on and off on an individual base via: Privacy -> PGP/MIME And as general option you can set it from the main menu with: Tools -> Privacy -> OpenPGP options -> Email -> Use PGP/MIME RD> Rölf ?? Not Rölf, Roelof, quite a different name, over here 'oe' is pronounced as the 'u' in Rudolph -- Groetjes, Roelof Every person constructs their own bed of nails. The Bat! 3.62.14 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 1 pop3 account, server on LAN OTFE enabled P4 3GHz 2 GB RAM
pgpRFrcwLb6aq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________ Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
