Hallo Robert,

On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 12:13:54 -0500GMT (19-11-2005, 18:13 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:

>> %UsePGP%-
>> %PGPMIME%-

RD> Question on the mime part. I am using gpg 1.4.2 or is it 1.42, anyway,
RD> i discovered if I put the macro %nopgpmime,  then my %signcomplete
RD> worked.  Otherwise every *seemed* to clearsign the text but the hash
RD> words and stuff at the bootom never got added. Not sure how I figured
RD> to add that macro, but anyway, what are the factors concerning the
RD> mime part of %pgpmime

Actually, this message is PGP signed too.
But what I'm using is PGP/MIME that means that the signature is added
as an attachment not as an add-on to the text.
I prefer PGP/MIME to inline signing, because it makes the body less
cluttered.
Depends a bit on your contact though. Not all mail clients support
PGP/MIME, so when your contact uses Outlook, or Outlook Express then
PGP/MIME is a big no.
I'm using PGP mostly around these lists and TB supports it just fine,
and with %PGPMIME and %NOPGPMIME you can force the behaviour in
templates.
In the editor you can set it on and off on an individual base via:
  Privacy -> PGP/MIME
And as general option you can set it from the main menu with:
  Tools -> Privacy -> OpenPGP options -> Email -> Use PGP/MIME

RD> Rölf ??

Not Rölf, Roelof, quite a different name, over here 'oe' is pronounced
as the 'u' in Rudolph

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

Every person constructs their own bed of nails.

The Bat! 3.62.14
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
1 pop3 account, server on LAN
OTFE enabled
P4 3GHz
2 GB RAM

Attachment: pgpRFrcwLb6aq.pgp
Description: PGP signature

________________________________________________
Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to