Hello Robert, On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 10:29:35 -0500 GMT (25/03/2006, 22:29 +0700 GMT), Robert D. wrote:
>> In fact, they should be blank by default. RD> OK ... I shall ... but could you enlighten me as to why it should be RD> blank? It's not your fault, the default is set by Ritlabs. It should be blank by default because it is only necessary if the Reply-To address and the From-address differ. In that case you have to set it anyway; but the default causes problems with some mailing lists (as you have encountered). >> Hm. On all lists I post, the list software will overwrite RD> dunno laddie , however, there are a couple of them, one being: RD> Analog-Help <analog-help@lists.meer.net> where this ALWAYS happens RD> to me. I won't subscribe to that list to find out. ;-) Depending on what list software they use, I am pretty sure that there is an option for the required overwrite. -- Cheers, Thomas. There are plenty of fish in the sea¡K well that¡Šs great for the fish. But I date humans. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 3.71.03 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 ________________________________________________ Current version is 3.71.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html