Hello Roelof, On Tue, 9 May 2006 18:57:00 +0200 GMT (09/05/2006, 23:57 +0700 GMT), Roelof Otten wrote:
TF>> So everybody agrees that the built-in backup/restore function is not TF>> sufficient? Somebody should tell the developers! ;-) RO> It sufficed for me when I restored TB to this system. That was two RO> years ago, but I don't think Ritlabs took features from the backup RO> system. When I make a backup/restore, I expect the restored version to be a clone of the backed up version. This is happening with my manual backup. What TB does is a partial backup/restore, not a full one. I don't think they took anything away (it was never any better), but they forgot to include the tbuser.def. -- Cheers, Thomas. Things are more like they are now than they ever were before. - Dwight D. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 3.80.03 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 ________________________________________________ Current version is 3.80.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
