Dear Rich, @12-Jul-2006, 22:50 -0400 (13-Jul 03:50 here) rich gregory [RG] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
... <snip> RG> Once upon a time some spammer(s) did choose to use TB! due to it's RG> configuriblity. Untrue. There was a spam remailer software package that offered a The Bat! X-Mailer header as one of its camouflage options. Along with Outlook Express and a few others. The spam was sent by this mean and not by The Bat!, making ignorant ISP techs react in an insane manner. http://www.ritlabs.com/ru/products/thebat/advice_detail.php?ID=189 This URL should be passed on to any ISP found to be arbitrarily banning TB messages. ... <snip> IAW>> Maybe RITLabs needs to allow the user to enter whatever text they want IAW>> there! RG> Wasn't there an .EXE hack for TB! some versions ago, before that RG> option made it's way into TB!, that would allow you to do just RG> that? The option exists freely and I have use it. Check my headers. I suppress the X-Mailer header by the configuration option and use this macro: %SetHeader("User-agent","TB/%THEBATVERSION (by RITlabs)")%- To insert my own variant. I am proud to use TB, but have to acknowledge that some very poorly educated ISPs out there are behaving irresponsibly. -- Cheers -- //.arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator and fellow end user TB! v3.81.07 Beta on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2 '
pgpIi24N3swnU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________ Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
