Hello Mic, Sunday, July 30, 2006, 4:27:53 PM, you wrote:
MC> I moved from Spampal (due to it's increasing uselessness) to K9 and MC> now onto AntispamSniper. Been using it about a month or so, I guess. MC> I prefer it to K9 because it seems just as accurate, if not more so, and MC> if something slips through, marking it as junk both teaches the plugin MC> and deletes it in one act, rather than having to go back out to K9 to MC> change it there after deleting it in TheBat. More efficient. Well, I installed it (trial commercial version) a couple of days ago. I still do have K9 for other mail-clients, but AntispamSniper does a rather good job until now. I did have 2 false positives (of which 1 message from Thomas Fernandez!), while I did not have even 1 false positive with K9. But, as mentioned above, marking as junk (or correcting a false positive) is easier than in K9. Moreover, mail handling seems to go quicker than through K9. So, unless problems should occur during evaluation, I think I will go for the commercial version. -- Best Wishes, Mark using The Bat! 3.81.12 Beta ________________________________________________ Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
