Hello Thomas, I would like to add a disclaimer: I have not used either of them and don't know whether they can cause any problems whatsoever.
Cheers, Thomas. On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 09:04:09 +0700 GMT (16/09/2006, 09:04 +0700 GMT), Thomas Fernandez wrote: TF> Hello Peter, TF> On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 18:08:05 +0200 GMT (15/09/2006, 23:08 +0700 GMT), TF> Peter Meyns wrote: S>>> If Voyager can't be run unencrypted, can TB be run portable? PM>> The latter is probably more difficult, as The Bat! stores a lot of PM>> settings in the registry. But then, as we see with Voyager, this isn't PM>> impossible. For now I think, the easier way for RIT would be to allow PM>> to install Voyager without encryption. TF> I think TheBatch(http://allbat.info/index.php?1131389177) or DynBat TF> (http://www.thebatworld.de/system/sections/index.php?op=viewarticle&artid=120) TF> could help. TF> A bit of a comparison of the two in the form of a TBUDL thread is TF> here: TF> http://www.mail-archive.com/tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com/msg83190.html -- Cheers, Thomas. Every day, the hummingbird eats its own weight in food. You may wonder how it weighs the food. It doesn't. It just eats another hummingbird. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 3.85.03 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 ________________________________________________ Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
