Hello Jack,

Monday, March 22, 2010, 6:03:17 AM, you wrote:

> Hello Tim,

> On Monday, March 22, 2010 you wrote:

>>> In days of yore when this question was asked of the list, the reply
>>> was frequently "K9" (http://keir.net/k9.html) which I have used
>>> since then.  Upon request K9 displays ALL received email and gives
>>> *YOU* the choice to flag selected messages as spam.  It became
>>> routine for me to fetch my emails and then immediately look at what
>>> K9 had for me.  I would then flag those spam messages as such so
>>> that K9 would learn what to look for next time.

>>> Do a search for K9 at:
>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/tbudl%40thebat.dutaint.com/ and see what
>>> all the discussions were at the time.

>>> My incidence of spam now is almost non-existent.  I *MIGHT* receive
>>> one or two spam emails per month now.  Is it because of K9? I don't
>>> know and I don't care but I'm stick'n with K9.


TH>> Thanks Jack, one quick question: when K9 determines spam from the tray
TH>> icon  for  instance:  New: 3 Good: 1 Spam: 2, why do the spam continue
TH>> through to TB?

> K9 simply adds the word "SPAM" (or whatever you tell it to add) to
> the subject line *before* the message gets to TB!. It doesn't do
> anything else (except learn from experience).  Once the message
> reaches your (my) inbox I have a filter set up which routes any
> incoming message with the word "Spam" anywhere in the subject line
> into a folder called amusingly enough, "Spam."  I then confirm that
> they are indeed spam and manually delete them from the "Spam" folder.

> Also each time you fetch your email you have to open K9 and tell it
> which of the incoming messages are spam.  From then on it will flag
> (with the word "Spam" in the subject) any messages which match or
> closely match the criteria it uses to identify spam.

> I seem to recall that K9 is much more sophisticated that I'm making
> it out to be. It's been so long since I started using K9 that I've
> forgotten just about everything I ever knew about it.  That's why
> it's important to read the information contained at the
> http://keir.net/k9.html site and the discussions found in TB!'s archives.


I understand what you are saying except for one thing: K9 defines Spam
within  the K9 program but does not tag emails with the word Spam upon
TB retrieving them so I do not understand what you are referring to by
the  word  spam  in the subject heading.  Can you further explain what
you mean by K9 inserting or tagging the subject headings with the word
spam so I can set TB to send these emails to a spam filter.

-- 
Best regards,
 Tim                            mailto:timh...@cox.net


________________________________________________
Current version is 4.2.23 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to