You published the same yes and *there is my name and Web address* on it, which you cannot modify because I published the hash of the file.
Are you sure that you understand the topic? No pb if you don't that's normal. 1. The hash uniquely represents the file 2. I publish the hash 3. I get time-stamped the hash instead of the file itself because not giving the control of the file to service providers is a good idea. Pars PS: You should decide if this list is for scientific discussion of CFP announcement. I am confused each time I come here :-) On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Nikos Fotiou <[email protected]> wrote: > Pars, > I have published the exact same file (not even a single word changed) > with a complete different hash. You can find it here > http://pages.cs.aueb.gr/~fotiou/files/output.pdf > Hashing is about protecting file representation (its bytes if you > will) and not the actual file content. Perceptual hash would have > probably done that job better. > > In any case I think this "standard" has received more attention from > the list, that it deserves. > > Best, > Nikos > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Pars Mutaf <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > In case people would doubt this standard's security (which would be > normal > > because it is new): > > > > I protect my work using the Flower Standard as follows: > > > > The following link is my original work and I want to protect this idea: > > > > http://www.freewebs.com/pmutaf/notall-eng-dec10-2012.pdf > > > > I put a flower sign in it, take the file's "digest" and publish the > digest > > at for example Twitter which shows that I published this idea today. The > > digest can be viewed here: > > > > https://twitter.com/parsmutaf/status/278066437086654464< > http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fparsmutaf%2Fstatus%2F278066437086654464&h=DAQE8P8Ff&s=1 > > > > > > The process takes less than 1 minute. I suspect that it is more secure > than > > the patent/copyright office. The whole planet knows now for certain that > I > > published this idea first. > > > > Cheers, > > > > -- > > Pars Mutaf > > flower-standard.org > > _______________________________________________ > > IEEE Communications Society Tech. Committee on Computer Communications > > (TCCC) - for discussions on computer networking and communication. > > [email protected] > > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/tccc > -- Pars Mutaf flower-standard.org _______________________________________________ IEEE Communications Society Tech. Committee on Computer Communications (TCCC) - for discussions on computer networking and communication. [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/tccc
