> > I think it was very rude to cross-post it over there > > anyway. I would hope that, divorce or no divorce, some > > kind of basic email etiquette would still apply. > > A TCP member -- intentionally or unintentionally -- cross-posted in > response to the original post. It certainly isn't Lisa's fault that > the post showed up on techwr-l.
Guys...cross-posting happened. It will happen again. It has nothing to do with the history of the lists. It has nothing to do with divorce or any euphemism anyone wants to use. It happens with all the lists associated with our profession. Is having 10X the traffic about it not worse than the instance of it happening? Can we get past that there is another list and let the lists get on with doing their thing? John Posada Senior Technical Writer "I think the problem, to be quite honest with you, is that you've never actually known what the question is." _______________________________________________ Are you a Help Authoring Trainer or Consultant? Let clients find you at www.HAT.Matrix.com, the searchable HAT database based on Char James-Tanny's HAT Comparison Matrix. Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for details. Interested in Interactive 3D Documentation? Get the scoop at http://www.doc-u-motion.com -- your 3D documentation community. _______________________________________________ Technical Communication Professionals To post a message to the list, send an email to TCP@techcommpros.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://techcommpros.com/mailman/listinfo/tcp_techcommpros.com or, via email, send a blank message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit the TCP site at http://www.techcommpros.com To find out more about the list, including archives and your account options, visit http://techcommpros.com/mailman/listinfo/tcp_techcommpros.com If you need assistance with the list, write to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
