On Jun 2, 2005, at 1:35 PM, mcr wrote:
Seems reasonable, but it certainly seems like a Windows.dll silly
to me.
Yes, but, as per my mail, there are arguably other reasons why
pcap_dump_ftell() should exist, namely that applications should have
the idea that a "pcap_dumper_t" is just a "FILE *" wired into them.
Loris> Is it ok if I make these changes and check them in the CVS?
Or, maybe "windump" shouldn't be built with a .dll version of
libpcap.
That could be done, but that seems like a bit of a hack - why should
tcpdump/WinDump have a limitation that other programs using libpcap/
WinPcap don't?
-
This is the tcpdump-workers list.
Visit https://lists.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.
