On Jun 13, 2013, at 12:07 PM, Guy Harris <g...@alum.mit.edu> wrote: > It's not a show-stopper - we can just document them as containing a time > stamp but note that it's redundant with the time stamp in pcap and pcap-ng > files, and say that the time stamp from the pcap packet record header or the > pcap-ng packet block header should be used and the time stamp in the packet > header should be ignored. > > Given that I've already checked in a LINKTYPE_/DLT_ value of 250, and > assigned a value of 251 for Bluetooth Low Energy air interface link-layer > packets, we might as well stick with the existing format, with a "time stamp > is redundant, don't use it" note.
OK, I've checked in and pushed an update to the link-layer types page; it should show up on the tcpdump.org Web site in 24 to 48 hours. _______________________________________________ tcpdump-workers mailing list tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers
