print-x test case:

16c16
< IP 127.0.0.1.55920 > 127.0.0.1.80: Flags [P.], seq 1:203, ack 1, win 8192, 
options [nop,nop,TS val 1306300951 ecr 1306300950], length 202
---
> IP 127.0.0.1.55920 > 127.0.0.1.80: Flags [P.], seq 1:203, ack 1, win 8192, 
> options [nop,nop,TS val 1306300951 ecr 1306300950], length 202: HTTP: GET / 
> HTTP/1.1
38c38
< IP 127.0.0.1.80 > 127.0.0.1.55920: Flags [P.], seq 1:5560, ack 203, win 8192, 
options [nop,nop,TS val 1306300953 ecr 1306300951], length 5559
---
> IP 127.0.0.1.80 > 127.0.0.1.55920: Flags [P.], seq 1:5560, ack 203, win 8192, 
> options [nop,nop,TS val 1306300953 ecr 1306300951], length 5559: HTTP: 
> HTTP/1.1 200 OK

Did something change with the print-http and it's sensitivity to flags?

--
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [
]     m...@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [

_______________________________________________
tcpdump-workers mailing list
tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org
https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers

Reply via email to