On Jul 28, 2016, at 7:12 AM, Christian <christian.rupp.stuttg...@freenet.de> 
wrote:

> I have encountered a problem.
> 
> I am capturing Packages with hardware timestamps and nanosecond 
> precision...but the timestamps are bugged.
> 
> sadly I'm not at the place where I captured the data, so the used used 
> command might be slightly different, as I have to work from my memory:
> tcpdump -i eth4 port 33330 -v -tt -j adapter_unsynced 
> --time-stamp-precision=nano > dumpfile
> 
> The problem is, that if the time is at below 100ms, the 0.1  field is not 0 
> as it should be, but doesn't exist.

So by "the 0.1 field" you mean "the tenths digit", so that, for example, a time 
stamp of 1.05 seconds would appear as 1.5?

And are you saying that libpcap is providing bad time stamps, with an incorrect 
nanoseconds field, or are you saying that tcpdump is incorrectly printing a 
good time stamp?
_______________________________________________
tcpdump-workers mailing list
tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org
https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers

Reply via email to