On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 9:23 PM, Erik de Jong <erikdej...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Michael Richardson <m...@sandelman.ca> > wrote: > >> Erik de Jong <erikdej...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > I was engaged in other activities lately, but would like to pick >> this >> > up again. Anything that I will have to address before a DLT can be >> > assigned? As stated in the last revision there is a field for >> syncword >> > included that will allow analyzers to parse the packets according to >> > the correct protocol. Later today I'll meet some LoRa related >> > manufacturers and I want to ask them if they're willing to support >> this >> > encapsulation in their products for debugging purposes. >> >> It's your consensus process, not ours. >> > > As I'm requesting the type number from the project, I wouldn't want to > annoy you with incomplete/rubbish requests. Hence my question ;-) > > >> >> We'd love to have a stable URL to point to, but we'll settle for your >> email >> address :-) >> >> >> (https://github.com/eriknl/LoRaTap). >> >> This would be fine, if you put a git tag on it, since you might want to >> revise it later on. >> > > Here is the initial release tagged: https://github.com/eriknl/ > LoRaTap/releases/tag/v0.1 > Hoping not to sound too ignorant, but I was wondering if there is anything else I am expected to do now as I didn't get a number assigned yet. Best regards, Erik _______________________________________________ tcpdump-workers mailing list tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers
