--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, 2022-06-20 at 08:34 -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
> Tomasz Moń <deso...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2022-06-14 at 10:49 -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
> >> Tomasz Moń via tcpdump-workers wrote:
> >> > I think I have summed up whole discussion in the libpcap commit
> >> > message. High-speed and Low-speed are pretty much clear, as
> these links
> >> > never observe other speed packets. Full-speed is the only
> disputable
> >> > one, but I believe the PRE packets are really a corner case that
> is not
> >> > worth per-packet speed encoding. If the user has obsolete setup
> to
> >> > trigger the corner case in the first place, then such user will
> >> > definitely know to just capture at the downstream link for
> low-speed
> >> > traffic.
> >>
> >> I think that Guy and I thought that you'll be better off with a single
> >> LINKTYPE with a subtype header, but if you want to go with three, I
> don't
> >> object.
>
> > I don't see any value (and according to information theory there is no
> > information) in per packet subtype header that would be set to exactly
> > the same value for *every single packet* captured on Low- or High-speed
> > link.
>
> That's fine with me.
> I will merge the pull request this afternoon.
A week has passed and the pull requests are still pending. Is there
anything left to do on my end?
Best Regards,
Tomasz
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
tcpdump-workers mailing list
tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org
https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers
