--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 15:53:21 -0800
Guy Harris <ghar...@sonic.net> wrote:
> On Jan 18, 2023, at 3:32 PM, Denis Ovsienko via tcpdump-workers
> <tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org> wrote:
>
> > As it turns out, there is another unused macro
> > (AC_LBL_HAVE_RUN_PATH), tcpslice became the first to lose this
> > luggage.
>
> Unused in libpcap back to 0.4 and tcpdump back to 3.4, so it may be
> another one used in some LBL projects but not libpcap or tcpdump.
So, libpcap and tcpdump have lost a few unused macros as well. I did
NOT touch the following unused AC_DEFUNs in tcpdump aclocal.m4:
* AC_LBL_CHECK_64BIT_FORMAT -- this used to define the PRI[doux]64
conversion specifiers before C99 became required/presumed. I wonder
if this presumption is subject to the same problem as the sizeof
length modifier: the compiler might be C99, but the libc may be not.
If trying to compensate for this [again] would be a waste of effort
and the best move would be to delete the macro, at least the build
system could verify that all the required printf() features are in
place -- in fact, a single piece of C code could exercise as many
printf() features as required in one go and fail if at least one of
those failed. Or would it be over-engineering?
* AC_LBL_SSLEAY -- is there anything useful to take from here?
--
Denis Ovsienko
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
tcpdump-workers mailing list
tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org
https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers
